linux-kernel - [ 046/149] uevent: send events in correct order according to seqnum (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120330194843.681593116@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:49:19 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: [ 046/149] uevent: send events in correct order according to seqnum (v3)

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>

commit 7b60a18da393ed70db043a777fd9e6d5363077c4 upstream.

The queue handling in the udev daemon assumes that the events are
ordered.

Before this patch uevent_seqnum is incremented under sequence_lock,
than an event is send uner uevent_sock_mutex. I want to say that code
contained a window between incrementing seqnum and sending an event.

This patch locks uevent_sock_mutex before incrementing uevent_seqnum.

v2: delete sequence_lock, uevent_seqnum is protected by uevent_sock_mutex
v3: unlock the mutex before the goto exit

Thanks for Kay for the comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Tested-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 lib/kobject_uevent.c |   19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c
+++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
@@ -29,16 +29,17 @@
 
 u64 uevent_seqnum;
 char uevent_helper[UEVENT_HELPER_PATH_LEN] = CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sequence_lock);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET
 struct uevent_sock {
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct sock *sk;
 };
 static LIST_HEAD(uevent_sock_list);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(uevent_sock_mutex);
 #endif
 
+/* This lock protects uevent_seqnum and uevent_sock_list */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(uevent_sock_mutex);
+
 /* the strings here must match the enum in include/linux/kobject.h */
 static const char *kobject_actions[] = {
 	[KOBJ_ADD] =		"add",
@@ -136,7 +137,6 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *k
 	struct kobject *top_kobj;
 	struct kset *kset;
 	const struct kset_uevent_ops *uevent_ops;
-	u64 seq;
 	int i = 0;
 	int retval = 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET
@@ -243,17 +243,16 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *k
 	else if (action == KOBJ_REMOVE)
 		kobj->state_remove_uevent_sent = 1;
 
+	mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
 	/* we will send an event, so request a new sequence number */
-	spin_lock(&sequence_lock);
-	seq = ++uevent_seqnum;
-	spin_unlock(&sequence_lock);
-	retval = add_uevent_var(env, "SEQNUM=%llu", (unsigned long long)seq);
-	if (retval)
+	retval = add_uevent_var(env, "SEQNUM=%llu", (unsigned long long)++uevent_seqnum);
+	if (retval) {
+		mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
 		goto exit;
+	}
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_NET)
 	/* send netlink message */
-	mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(ue_sk, &uevent_sock_list, list) {
 		struct sock *uevent_sock = ue_sk->sk;
 		struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -287,8 +286,8 @@ int kobject_uevent_env(struct kobject *k
 		} else
 			retval = -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
 #endif
+	mutex_unlock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
 
 	/* call uevent_helper, usually only enabled during early boot */
 	if (uevent_helper[0] && !kobj_usermode_filter(kobj)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/