[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201203302105.q2UL58Z8006306@farm-0012.internal.tilera.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:46:29 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arch/tile: use atomic exchange in arch_write_unlock()
This idiom is used elsewhere when we do an unlock by writing a zero,
but I missed it here. Using an atomic operation avoids waiting
on the write buffer for the unlocking write to be sent to the home cache.
Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
---
arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
index 72be590..5f8b6a0 100644
--- a/arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
+++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
__insn_mf();
- rw->lock = 0;
+ __insn_exch4(&rw->lock, 0); /* Avoid waiting in the write buffer. */
}
static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists