| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120331154625.GA6241@albatros> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:46:25 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> To: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: reset mount options after the last procfs umount On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 17:31 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 31 of March 2012, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 16:19 +0200, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > > > "after all procs are umounted". For me such way is fine but still can > > > suprise people. > > > > > > Anyway - what's the problem with implementing support for separate > > > options for each mount point? > > > > Well, IMHO multiple procs in one pid namespace is a very strange system > > configuration. I didn't see such installations. > > I have one real world case - linux-vserver.org guests where pid namespace is > optional and usually not used. I'm a vserver noob. Does it allow using multiple containers sharing the same pid namespace? Having only a single init process? Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists