[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV-7rnVH1no3wbCJMq0L-FfbAEBh4+XDrnD93X_bK3HvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:18:06 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] vt-d irq_remap_ops patchset
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Ingo,
>>
>> Here is the Joerg's irq_remap_ops patchset updated for the latest -tip.
>> Simplified some of the naming conventions to follow the irq_remapping
>> terminology. There are still some "if (irq_remapping_enabled)" checks in
>> io_apic.c that I would like to roll into the new io_apic_ops. I will
>> look into that shortly.
>
> Just wondering, has this been tested on affected hardware, on
> top of latest -tip or so? I realize that most of these are
> clean-ups so they should not break anything, but checking would
> be worth it nevertheless.
Yes, I tested those patches on my setups with Nehalem, Westmere, and Sandbridge.
the last two are related to renaming only.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists