[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120331201324.GA17565@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:13:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE
On 03/31, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
> comment from v2.6.25-6245-g925d1c4 ("procfs task exe symlink"),
> where all this stuff was introduced:
>
> > ...
> > This avoids pinning the mounted filesystem.
>
> So, this logic is hooked into every file mmap/unmmap and vma split/merge just to
> fix some hypothetical pinning fs from umounting by mm which already unmapped all
> its executable files, but still alive. Does anyone know any real world example?
This is the question to Matt.
> keep mm->exe_file alive till final mmput().
Please see the recent discussion, http://marc.info/?t=133096188900012
(just in case, the patch itself was deadly wrong, don't look at it ;)
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -378,7 +378,6 @@ struct mm_struct {
>
> /* store ref to file /proc/<pid>/exe symlink points to */
> struct file *exe_file;
> - unsigned long num_exe_file_vmas;
Add Cyrill. This conflicts with
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch in -mm.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists