[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqcAXyh306=2=QKWyM3BE44=MT+nsuRQn5YLOLgbtZqicA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:43:19 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: ipv6: tunnel: hang when destroying ipv6 tunnel
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 19:51 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > It appears that a hang may occur when destroying an ipv6 tunnel, which
>> > I've reproduced several times in a KVM vm.
>
> kernel version?
latest linux-next
>> > [ 1561.564172] INFO: task kworker/u:2:3140 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>
> And nobody else?
Some more messages follow a bit later which get stuck in vfs related code.
> It would be nice to know what sysrq-t says, in particular the trace
> of khelper thread is interesting.
Sure, I'll get one when it happens again.
>> Something is wrong here, call_usermodehelper_exec ( ... UMH_WAIT_EXEC)
>> should not block forever.
>
> Yes, unless it triggers another request_module()...
>
> Tetsuo, could you please take a look? Unlikely, but may be this
> is fixed by your kmod-avoid-deadlock-by-recursive-kmod-call.patch
> in -mm ?
>
> Oleg.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists