linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120331044030.GB3077@pinguin>
Date:	Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:40:33 +0400
From:	Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@...il.com>
To:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu,
	eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org,
	scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	keescook@...omium.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 08/15] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF

Hi Will,

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 03:01:53PM -0500, Will Drewry wrote:

snipped

> +
> +/* Limit any path through the tree to 256KB worth of instructions. */
> +#define MAX_INSNS_PER_PATH ((1 << 18) / sizeof(struct sock_filter))
> +
> +static void seccomp_filter_log_failure(int syscall)
> +{
> +	int compat = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +	compat = is_compat_task();
> +#endif
> +	pr_info("%s[%d]: %ssystem call %d blocked at 0x%lx\n",
> +		current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
> +		(compat ? "compat " : ""),
> +		syscall, KSTK_EIP(current));
> +}

snipped

> +/**
> + * seccomp_attach_user_filter - attaches a user-supplied sock_fprog
> + * @user_filter: pointer to the user data containing a sock_fprog.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success and non-zero otherwise.
> + */
> +long seccomp_attach_user_filter(char __user *user_filter)
> +{
> +	struct sock_fprog fprog;
> +	long ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +	if (is_compat_task()) {
> +		struct compat_sock_fprog fprog32;
> +		if (copy_from_user(&fprog32, user_filter, sizeof(fprog32)))
> +			goto out;
> +		fprog.len = fprog32.len;
> +		fprog.filter = compat_ptr(fprog32.filter);
> +	} else /* falls through to the if below. */
> +#endif
> +	if (copy_from_user(&fprog, user_filter, sizeof(fprog)))
> +		goto out;
> +	ret = seccomp_attach_filter(&fprog);
> +out:
> +	return ret;
> +}

Do we really need to surround is_compat_task() with CNFIG_COMPAT?
It seems that this case has already handled in compat.h [1]

[1] http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.3/include/linux/compat.h#L566

Best wishes
Vladimir Murzin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/