[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F787392.5040308@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:26:10 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clkdev: Implement managed clk_get()
On 4/1/2012 4:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Allow clk API users to simplify their cleanup paths by providing a
> managed version of clk_get().
I was thinking the same thing last week.
>
> Due to the lack of a standard struct clk to look up the device from a
> managed clk_put() is not provided, it would be very unusual to use this
> function so it's not a big loss.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt | 3 +++
> drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/clk.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
But why is this part of clkdev.c? devm_clk_get() should work regardless
of the implementation of clk_get() so can we put it into some other file
that is compiled if HAVE_CLK=y so everyone benefits from this and not
just users who select CLKDEV_LOOKUP?
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists