[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH+eYFDqTrgpz7Rh+LyUUMBp+PuURgLzF5xv94jK7HkhDLRoHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 01:02:36 +0530
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 22:52, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Mark Brown
> <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>> The impact should be minimal since currently there are no mainline
>> systems which actually provide a vcore regulator so none need updating.
>
> Oh yes there are:
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c
>
> This driver registers a number of voltage domain regulators,
> among those:
>
> static struct regulator_consumer_supply db8500_vape_consumers[] = {
> (...)
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "sdi0"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "sdi1"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "sdi2"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "sdi3"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "sdi4"),
> (...)
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "uart0"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "uart1"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vcore", "uart2"),
>
> IIRC the machine will not boot (i.e. these drivers cannot even
> probe) without these regulators in place, so they get enabled by
> the AMBA bus code.
These vcore "regulators" do nothing but increment a variable which is
write-only in mainline, so the machine will boot and drivers will probe
fine with Mark's patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists