linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:27:50 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 09:22:50PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

> Combined with the PL022 patch this causes a power regression since
> the PL022 is hereafter always on.

I guess this code isn't in mainline, though?  In that case you can
always add a revert of this commit to your out of tree patches if you
need to.

> But I guess if I fix a power domain patch to accomplish much the
> same things then nothing is really lost...

Let me know if you run into any trouble with that - I don't have any
systems which could usefully use such support so I'm unlikely to work on
it directly and from what you were saying you'll need to integrate with
existing power domain code anyway.

> And I do like the change, if for nothing else so for the fact that it
> eventually pushes to power domains what belongs there, so:

> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Thanks.

> But to the defence: power domain code was not in the kernel
> when the AMBA "vcore" regulator was introduced so how else
> could we do it... except for inventing power domains...

Which might've happened sooner if we'd noticed :)  There were some other
platforms doing similar things but they mostly used the clock API since
it was always entirely platform code until 3.4 so they're less intrusive
into the generic code.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)