[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120401213819.GC17795@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:38:19 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel
threads
syscall_regfunc() ignores the kernel thread because "it has
no effect", see cc3b13c1 "Don't trace kernel thread syscalls".
However, this means that a user-space task spawned by
call_usermodehelper() won't report the system calls if
kernel_execve() is called when sys_tracepoint_refcount != 0.
Remove this check. Hopefully the unnecessary report from
ret_from_fork path mentioned by cc3b13c1 is fine. In fact
"this is the only case" is not true. Say, kernel_execve()
itself does "int 80" on X86_32. Hopefully fine too.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/tracepoint.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index e2a4523..2403e60 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -739,9 +739,7 @@ void syscall_regfunc(void)
if (!sys_tracepoint_refcount) {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do_each_thread(g, t) {
- /* Skip kernel threads. */
- if (!(t->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
- set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT);
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT);
} while_each_thread(g, t);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists