[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5muM-4_pVt59XeNrOZZ=28P0hT8GiMqBUk+0nxnUw9L+VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:26:58 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>
Subject: Re: [ 105/175] CIFS: Respect negotiated MaxMpxCount
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:10 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> 3.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>
> I'm not sure it's a good idea to put this patch into any stable release
> just yet. I think it's a correct and necessary fix, but it has some
> potential to cause regressions too (or uncover other preexisting
> problems with this code). Might it be best to wait until we have some
> more experience with this before we push it into stable?
Delaying it a little is probably ok, but weigh that against the
frequency/severity
of the problem that Pavel's fix addresses: ie sequential writes to some
versions of Windows 7 and Windows Vista can fail partway
through large file copy (which also causes those servers
to become unresponsive to subsequent connection requests
as well) so the fix does address a hot problem.
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists