[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F79755B.3030703@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:46:03 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:13:24PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> Add Cyrill. This conflicts with
>> c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch in -mm.
>
> Thanks for CC'ing, Oleg. I think if thise series go in it won't
> be a problem to update my patch accordingly.
In this patch I leave mm->exe_file lockless.
After exec/fork we can change it only for current task and only if mm->mm_users == 1.
something like this:
task_lock(current);
if (atomic_read(¤t->mm->mm_users) == 1)
set_mm_exe_file(current->mm, new_file);
else
ret = -EBUSY;
task_unlock(current);
task_lock() protect this code against get_task_mm()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists