linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: kill vma flag VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:13:49 +0400
From:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
CC:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	"oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:46:03PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:13:24PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add Cyrill. This conflicts with
>>>> c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch in -mm.
>>>
>>> Thanks for CC'ing, Oleg. I think if thise series go in it won't
>>> be a problem to update my patch accordingly.
>>
>> In this patch I leave mm->exe_file lockless.
>> After exec/fork we can change it only for current task and only if mm->mm_users == 1.
>>
>> something like this:
>>
>> task_lock(current);
>> if (atomic_read(&current->mm->mm_users) == 1)
>> 	set_mm_exe_file(current->mm, new_file);
>> else
>> 	ret = -EBUSY;
>> task_unlock(current);
>>
>> task_lock() protect this code against get_task_mm()
>
> I see. Konstantin, the question is what is more convenient way to update the
> patch in linux-next. The c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch
> is in -mm already, so I either should wait until Andrew pick your series up and
> send updating patch on top, or I could fetch your series, update my patch and
> send it here as reply. Hmm?

Let's wait for Andrew's response. And maybe somebody disagree with my changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/