linux-kernel - Re: [patch] UBIFS: Add cryptographic functionality when a key is passed to the compress / decompress functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:57:54 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Joel Reardon <joel@...mbassador.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] UBIFS: Add cryptographic functionality when a key is
 passed to the compress / decompress functions

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 16:48 +0200, Joel Reardon wrote:
> >
> > You support only one length - please, kill ivlen parameter.
> >
> > Also, should ubifs_aes_crypt be static? I do not see any users outside
> > of compress.c. In this case remove the "ubifs_" prefix. But a
> > non-written convention, in UBIFS we _tend_ to prefix only non-static
> > functions with "ubifs_" and avoid having it for static functions.
> >
> 
> Should length for key remain, and the IV is just the same? Or should the
> global #define just be used inside the aes function.

I guess I was a little confused WRT iv vs cryptokey. Anyway, I thought
you just use UBIFS_CRYPTO_KEYSIZE for all of this, why not to just use
the constant in this function? Why passing the length as an argument?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)