[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333381626.2701.28.camel@menhir>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:47:06 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: GFS2: Pre-pull patch posting (merge window)
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:35 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 03:44 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 18:06 -0400, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> Instead of trying to select everything in GFS2, how about doing it this way?
> >>
> >> [PATCH] gfs2: use depends instead of select in kconfig
> >>
> >> Avoids having to duplicate the dependencies of what is 'select'ed (and on
> >> down...)
> >>
> >> Those dependencies are currently incomplete, leading to broken builds with
> >> GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and IP_SCTP=n.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>
> >> ---
> >> fs/gfs2/Kconfig | 7 ++-----
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/Kconfig b/fs/gfs2/Kconfig
> >> index c465ae0..eb08c9e 100644
> >> --- a/fs/gfs2/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/fs/gfs2/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
> >> config GFS2_FS
> >> tristate "GFS2 file system support"
> >> depends on (64BIT || LBDAF)
> >> - select DLM if GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM
> >> - select CONFIGFS_FS if GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM
> >> - select SYSFS if GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM
> >> - select IP_SCTP if DLM_SCTP
> >> select FS_POSIX_ACL
> >> select CRC32
> >> select QUOTACTL
> >> @@ -29,7 +25,8 @@ config GFS2_FS
> >>
> >> config GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM
> >> bool "GFS2 DLM locking"
> >> - depends on (GFS2_FS!=n) && NET && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) && HOTPLUG
> >> + depends on (GFS2_FS!=n) && NET && INET && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) && \
> >> + HOTPLUG && DLM && CONFIGFS_FS && SYSFS
> >> help
> >> Multiple node locking module for GFS2
> >>
> >
> > That looks ok to me. I've put it in the GFS2 -fixes tree, and if
> > everybody is happy with that I'll send a pull request shortly,
>
>
> Can we get Benjamin's patch merged, please?
> linux-next is still having build errors without it.
>
It is in the GFS2 -nmw tree now, so it will be in linux-next shortly.
I'll merge up the -fixes tree shortly, but I'm expecting one more patch
for that very shortly,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists