[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAe_U6+kqyn7mdujJKr-ysC+HyA0=pyO012H-FxYY6DSRjznJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:33:10 +0530
From: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: make modules behave better
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> There's really no point in doing all that
>> initcall trickery when we can safely let
>> udev handle module probing for us.
>>
>> Remove all of that trickery, by moving everybody
>> to module_init() and making proper use of
>> platform_device_register() rather than
>> platform_device_probe().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
>> ---
>>
>> Because this falls into the "has never worked before" category
>> I will be sending this only on the next merge window. This
>> also gives people enough time to complain about any mistakes
>> on the patch.
>
> This patch looks correct and right to me, but it breaks musb when it's
> compiled into the kernel, at least on the Nokia N950. I haven't yet figured
> out exactly why, though.
Is it an abort?
You can use the patch which I've sent to the list last week for fixing it.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg60603.html.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists