linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120402171916.GG15197@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:19:16 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:57:42PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> ARM PRIMECELL BUS SUPPORT
> M:      Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> S:      Maintained
> F:      drivers/amba/
> F:      include/linux/amba/bus.h

> not provide enough clues?  Should I delete all my entries in that file
> because the only people who look in there are spammers when the file is
> published on the web?

I did look in there and also in the git history which shows the same
information, hence my CCing you.  Linus introduced some doubt into my
mind that this might be something that went through arm-soc now rather
than via your tree even if you are still maintaining it as no specific
git tree or anything is mentioned there.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)