lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333338803.30734.37.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:53:23 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: broken nouveau dependency on power supply

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:06 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi folks !
> 
> With CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=m & nouveau built-in we get a build failure:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `.nouveau_pm_trigger':
> (.text+0xa56e8): undefined reference to `.power_supply_is_system_supplied'
> 
> nouveau probably needs to depends on CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY to force a module
> build with the latter is =m

Ok, not that trivial...

The problem is more like POWER_SUPPLY should be a bool, not a tristate.

If you think about it: you don't want things like nouveau to depend on a
random subsystem like that, people will never get it. In fact,
POWER_SUPPLY provides empty inline stubs when not enabled, so that's
really designed to not have depends...

However that -cannot- work if POWER_SUPPLY is modular and the drivers
who use it are not. The only fixes here that make sense I can think of
that don't also involve Kconfig horrors are:

 - Ugly: in power_supply.h, use the extern variant if

	defined(CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY) ||
	 (defined(CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))

IE. use the stub if power supply is a module and what is being built is
built-in. Of course that's not only ugly, it somewhat sucks from a user
perspective as the subsystem now exists but can't be used by some
drivers...

 - Better: Just make the bloody thing a bool :-) The power supply
framework itself is small enough, just make it a boolean option and
avoid the problem entirely. The actual power supply sub drivers can
remain modular of course.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ