linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] block/for-3.5/core: pull in cgroup/for-3.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120402195024.GA17175@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:50:24 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block/for-3.5/core: pull in cgroup/for-3.5

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:24:39PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2012-04-02 11:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Stephen.
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:59:05AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> today.  The best way to proceed is for the parts of the cgroup tree that
> >> the block tree will depend on (which may be the entire current cgroup
> >> tree) should be in a separate, stable (i.e. non rebasing/rewriting)
> >> branch that can be merged into both the cgroup and block trees.
> > 
> > Yeap, that's the intention of this pull request.  cgroup/for-3.5 is
> > already stable.  We just need it to be pulled into block/for-3.5/core.
> 
> It's pulled in.

Great, now we can merge the conf/file restructuring patchset.  Will
write in that thread.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/