[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204022251420.2542@ionos>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:52:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use
irq_alloc_desc() instead
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>
> > Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> writes:
> >
> >> This patch drops the powerpc-specific irq_map table and replaces it with
> >> directly using the irq_alloc_desc()/irq_free_desc() interfaces for allocating
> >> and freeing irq_desc structures.
> >
> > This breaks irqs on PowerMac G5. I see lost irq errors from the sata
> > driver.
>
> When I revert a09b659cd68c10ec6a30cb91ebd2c327fcd5bfe5 ("genirq: Fix
> long-term regression in genirq irq_set_irq_type() handling") on top of
> 3.4-rc1 the sata irq errors disappear, but I see a lot of spurious
Hmm. Which irq chip is handling the interrupt for that sata irq ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists