[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333401767.30734.58.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:22:47 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] PCI, powerpc: Register busn_res for root buses
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 05:19 -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
>
> In the POWER3 era we had several boxes that split the pci bus number
> space across domains and RTAS used the bus number to find the correct
> PHB. This contineed to the first RS64 boxes. By S80 and RS64-III
> it was obvious that we didn't have enough numbers to continue this
> ilusion and we added the presently used RTAS calls that take the pci
> domain as well as bus, device, and function numbers.
>
> The bus numbers split across pci domains started with the F50
> F50 chrp 32 bit platforms.
Ok, so old CHRPs would have a split as well...
I think the best is to honor the bus-range property of the PHB as min &
max values, and if we feel a need to allow the kernel to assign busses
beyond that, we can always quirk the appropriate platform code.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists