[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333409927.30734.62.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:47 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use
irq_alloc_desc() instead
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:52 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> If we want to fix it a better way, then sure, that'll be good. But
> what
> we shouldn't do is re-introduce one regression to fix a different
> regression.
>
> So, Thomas, what do you think about providing a way that a disabled
> interrupt could have its pending status cleared such that when it's
> enabled, any queued events are ignored? Maybe an
> enable_and_clear_irq() ?
Ok. Doesn't matter anyway, this shouldn't be the problem in this
specific case. IE. we shouldn't be setting that interrupt to NONE.
We should have parsed the device-tree and set the trigger appropriately.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists