[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120403143752.GA5150@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:37:52 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: account VMA before forced-COW via /proc/pid/mem
On 04/02, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
> Currently kernel does not account read-only private mappings into memory commitment.
> But these mappings can be force-COW-ed in get_user_pages().
Heh. tail -n3 Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting
may be you should update it then.
Can't really comment the patch, this is not my area. Still,
> + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + *pvma = vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> + if (vma && vma->vm_start <= addr) {
> + ret = vma->vm_end - addr;
> + if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_ACCOUNT | VM_NORESERVE | VM_SHARED |
> + VM_HUGETLB | VM_MAYWRITE)) == VM_MAYWRITE) {
> + if (!security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, vma_pages(vma)))
Oooooh, the whole vma. Say, gdb installs the single breakpoint into
the huge .text mapping...
I am not sure, but probably you want to check at least VM_IO/PFNMAP
as well. We do not want to charge this memory and retry with FOLL_FORCE
before vm_ops->access(). Say, /dev/mem.
Hmm. OTOH, if I am right then mprotect_fixup() should be fixed??
We drop ->mmap_sem... Say, the task does mremap() in between and
len == 2 * PAGE_SIZE. Then, for example, copy_to_user_page() can
write to the same page twice. Perhaps not a problem in practice,
I dunno.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists