[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7B1D2F.40409@hartkopp.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:54:23 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: "AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>
CC: "m.kleine-budde@...gutronix.de" <m.kleine-budde@...gutronix.de>,
"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Gole, Anant" <anantgole@...com>, "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: AM33XX: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch
D_CAN controller
On 03.04.2012 14:39, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Subject line of this patch should be
> "ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller"
No, the d_can IP core is generally not limited to ARM.
"can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller"
would be perfectly fine.
The correct way is:
1. post your new CAN driver to linux-can ML
2. When the major reviews & style fixes are done and the driver is fit for
mainline you can post it on ti-omap ML too
But an initial cross-posting of this CAN driver to netdev ML and linux-kernel
ML does not help anyone - it only increases traffic & confusion.
See MAINTAINERS:
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.3.1/MAINTAINERS#L1710
Thanks for following these hints,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists