[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333469800.26079.35.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:16:40 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk(): add KERN_CONT where needed
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:11 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:05, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 17:50 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> I did not claim to address the problem of concurrent continuation line
> >> writers, and this patch has absolutely nothing to do with that
> >> problem. It _does_ fix encountered problems,
> >
> > No it doesn't. It fixes problems _you_ encounter
> > with an unpublished modification of the printk
> > subsystem.
>
> Exactly. And that is what is written in the changelog of the patch.
> But all that does not matter, the change results in more correct code
> than the current one is; and that is all that matters.
>
> Sure, I see your point, and support your effort, but I don't think
> your arguments are related to this patch and you are hijacking
> something unrelated, which should be discussed in a separate mail
> thread, that's all.
Conversations happen all over the place and making
separate discussions isn't that valuable nor are
they really controllable.
Just write the change log to simply state "add KERN_CONT"
without mentioning your unpublished stuff.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists