[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120403165320.GG19952@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:53:20 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3] Support M95040 SPI EEPROM
* Ivo Sieben (meltedpianoman@...il.com) wrote:
> + instr = AT25_READ;
> + if (at25->chip.flags & EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR)
> + if (offset >= (1U << (at25->addrlen * 8)))
> + instr |= AT25_INSTR_BIT3;
> + *cp++ = instr;
<snip>
> + /*
> + * Certain EEPROMS have a size that is larger than the number of address
> + * bytes would allow (e.g. like M95040 from ST that has 512 Byte size
> + * but uses only one address byte (A0 to A7) for addressing.) For
> + * the extra address bit (A8, A16 or A24) bit 3 of the instruction byte
> + * is used. This instruction bit is normally defined as don't care for
> + * other AT25 like chips.
> + */
> +#define EE_INSTR_BIT3_IS_ADDR 0x0010
Is there some guarantee that this chip flag will always have this
meaning?
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists