[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC1317D8A38@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:07:22 +0000
From: "AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
CC: "m.kleine-budde@...gutronix.de" <m.kleine-budde@...gutronix.de>,
"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Gole, Anant" <anantgole@...com>, "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: AM33XX: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch
D_CAN controller
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for the comments,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:24:23, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 14:39, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Subject line of this patch should be
> > "ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller"
>
>
> No, the d_can IP core is generally not limited to ARM.
>
> "can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller"
>
> would be perfectly fine.
Agree, I will change the subject line in my next version of patch
>
> The correct way is:
>
> 1. post your new CAN driver to linux-can ML
> 2. When the major reviews & style fixes are done and the driver is fit for
> mainline you can post it on ti-omap ML too
>
> But an initial cross-posting of this CAN driver to netdev ML and linux-kernel
> ML does not help anyone - it only increases traffic & confusion
>
It's true, I will take care from next time onwards
Thanks
AnilKumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists