[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120403184901.GC27794@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:49:01 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:58:26PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> @@ -1894,6 +1895,14 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cg
> if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING)
> return -ESRCH;
>
> + /*
> + * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_THREAD_BOUND and become
> + * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
> + * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
> + */
> + if (tsk == kthreadd_task)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* Nothing to do if the task is already in that cgroup */
> oldcgrp = task_cgroup_from_root(tsk, root);
> if (cgrp == oldcgrp)
> @@ -2172,6 +2181,17 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgr
>
> if (threadgroup)
> tsk = tsk->group_leader;
> +
> + /*
> + * Workqueue threads may acquire PF_THREAD_BOUND and become
> + * trapped in a cpuset, or RT worker may be born in a cgroup
> + * with no rt_runtime allocated. Just say no.
> + */
> + if (tsk == kthreadd_task) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock_cgroup;
> + }
If we have this test here, do we need the same check in
cgroup_attach_task()/
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists