[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbfNPAay=FP_Wj-AmYJBbhcjND9Z-b+mahRM5uQoL-coA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:06:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, B29396@...escale.com,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, dongas86@...il.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
thomas.abraham@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com, sjg@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] pinctrl: tegra: Add complete device tree support
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 11:29 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Implement pinctrl_ops dt_node_to_map() and dt_free_map(). These allow
>>> complete specification of the desired pinmux configuration using device
>>> tree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Rebase on of_property_for_each_string() API changes.
>>
>> Stephen is this eligible for merge? Or does it need changes on top
>> of the v4 core patch?
>
> I believe if you take everything from v3, except replace the one patch
> that I posted a v4 for, and you'll be set. I don't believe the v4
> changes in the intermediate patch required and changes to any later
> patches. Let me know if you want me to repost the series, thanks!
Hm. I went in and applied Viresh's group enumeration refactoring
patch so I suspect tehy need some rebasing. Care to rebase to
the branch in -next tomorrow or so and I'll apply?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists