linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.4-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:57:14 +0900
From:	Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	vdumpa@...dia.com, hdoyu@...dia.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.4-rc1

On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Ok, it's been two weeks, and the merge window is over. Linux 3.4-rc1
> has been pushed out to the git servers, and the tar-ball and patches
> are going out as I type this (probably done by the time I'm done).
>
> And yes, if you actually counted, it has only been 13 days. And if
> somebody delayed their pull request until the last day of the merge
> window, I'm sure they'll be even happier to delay it another two
> months until the next merge window. Yay!
>
> That said, there are four pull requests in my mailbox that weren't
> delayed, and that I will (probably) still pull, but that I wanted to
> get extra confirmation from *other* maintainers from first. So they
> were sent in time, I just decided that I can make the actual pull
> choice a bit later.
>
> The four remaining pull requests (and the people I want comments from) are:
>
>  - HSI (High Speed Synchronous Serial Interface) framework. I'm
> planning on pulling this into 3.4, it's in my queue, but I wanted to
> bring it up one more time in case somebody has issues with it. Ping?
>
>  - pohmelfs. The old pohmelfs got deleted from staging, there's an
> all-new one waiting in the sidelines. Al was a bit unhappy about some
> of it, Evgeniy fixed it up some, and then the discussion died. Again,
> I'm likely to pull this, but I wanted more commentary on it.
>
>  - drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but
> didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for
> 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their
> lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I
> won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
>
>  - DMA-mapping framework. The tree now has a few more acks from
> people, and it's largely in the same situation as HSI is: I'll
> probably pull, but I really wanted the users who are impacted to
> actually talk to me about it.
>
Hi,

Now Marek and Nvidia persons are used it for DMA mapping based IOMMU.

Are there other person who help to merge it?
(+CC related persons).

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/