[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:13:22 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
drepper@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
On Sunday 01 April 2012, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 +
> >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
> >> fs/Makefile | 1 +
> >> fs/nextfd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 +
> >> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >
> > I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please
> > also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the
> > various architectures using the generic syscall table.
>
> Arnd: do you have any interest in leveraging the syscall scripts I did
> for x86? I have tried to make them as generic as possible, with the
> hope of getting more and more of syscall information into more easily
> processed form.
Sounds interesting, but I'm not planning to do the changes myself,
especially since I have no machine that actually uses the generic
syscall table.
Maybe I should ask the next person who submits a new architecture to
do that work, that's usually how progress in asm-generic happens
these days ;-)
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists