[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333626298.23520.107.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:44:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: support structured and multi-facility log
messages
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 10:35 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> The use of structured data is mainly focused on subsystem specific
> users. Like the block layer or the network stack could invent a bunch
> of well-defined set of properties, and wrap the emission of these up
> in some common subsystem logging functions for their drivers to use.
> They would reflect common log events, meaningful in the context of a
> specific subsystem.
I think this is generally less useful that you do.
> Think of it more like the model how we handle properties in uevents,
> it's a similar approach.
>
> This is not so much intended to convert the (almost random) language
> in slightly better (random) key/value pairs.
I think you should highlight this in the changelog.
People _will_ use it that way anyway.
> Userpace, which is the
> only reason to add that stuff in the first place, will need to know
> how to make sense out of the passed values, so in the future, we will
> need some kind of coordination per subsystem here.
I think you should separate your patch a bit.
Don't call it an extension to printk(), it's
hardly that, printk() is a function call that emits
stuff. The printk subsystem does a lot more.
perhaps:
changes for printk_emit()
changes for dev_printk
changes for devkmsg_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists