[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7DA009.4010802@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:37:13 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies
On 4/5/2012 2:53 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> This patch doesn't update all cpuidle device registrations. I will do that
question is if you want to do per cpu latencies, or if you want to have
both types of C state in one big table, and have each of the tegra cpyu
types pick half of them...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists