[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120405222604.GA15713@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:26:04 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/urgent] rcu: Permit call_rcu() from CPU_DYING notifiers
As of commit 29494be7, RCU adopts callbacks from the dying CPU in its
CPU_DYING notifier, which means that any callbacks posted by later
CPU_DYING notifiers are ignored until the CPU comes back online.
A WARN_ON_ONCE() was added to __call_rcu() by commit e5601400 to check
for this condition. Although this condition did not trigger (at least
as far as know) during -next testing, it did recently trigger in mainline
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/2/34).
This commit therefore causes RCU's CPU_DEAD notifier to adopt any
callbacks that were posted by CPU_DYING notifiers and removes the
WARN_ON_ONCE() from __call_rcu(). A more targeted warning for callback
posting from offline CPUs will be added as a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
rcutree.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 1050d6d..4c927e6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1406,11 +1406,41 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ int i;
unsigned long mask;
int need_report = 0;
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rnp. */
+ /* If a CPU_DYING notifier has enqueued callbacks, adopt them. */
+ if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) {
+ struct rcu_data *receive_rdp;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ receive_rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, smp_processor_id());
+
+ /* Adjust the counts. */
+ receive_rdp->qlen_lazy += rdp->qlen_lazy;
+ receive_rdp->qlen += rdp->qlen;
+ rdp->qlen_lazy = 0;
+ rdp->qlen = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Adopt all callbacks. The outgoing CPU was in no shape
+ * to advance them, so make them all go through a full
+ * grace period.
+ */
+ *receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxtlist;
+ receive_rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] =
+ rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ /* Initialize the outgoing CPU's callback list. */
+ rdp->nxtlist = NULL;
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++)
+ rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist;
+ }
+
/* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */
rcu_stop_cpu_kthread(cpu);
rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
@@ -1820,7 +1850,6 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
* a quiescent state betweentimes.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()));
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
/* Add the callback to our list. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists