[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333608177.7783.106.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:42:57 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 23:07 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > I submitted that, and it didn't fly. I like the generic exclusion
> > better, so I submit that for consideration.
> >
>
> [+akpm]
>
> The last time we went through this, it was left after Andrew had fixed it
> up when the cpusets version was merged in -mm without any disagreement
> from Peter who was cc'd and that version was acked both by myself and Paul
> Menage at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/14/402. Andrew dropped it and
> asked for a repost since there was some on-going scheduler work going on
> in linux-next that caused that version not to apply. No follow-up was
> ever offered.
Hm, I thought I did that.
> Why have we now gone in a completely different direction again?
I already said that after Peter griped and suggested global, I thought
about it, and liked that better. The submitted patchlet can either fly
or die. It's not a big deal.
If I need a reason to like global better, posix like: the user shall not
fool around with my "mom" vs a wishy washy comedy variant of same ;-)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists