[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204050055180.13439@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 01:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> That question made perfect sense to me. Putting a global resource in
> any bin of any sort makes little if any sense.
>
This has nothing to do with global resources, it has to do with
PF_THREAD_BOUND since those threads cannot move amongst these cgroups.
For cgroups that do not have anything to do with cpu affinity,
PF_THREAD_BOUND means nothing to their attachment rules. This patch is
addressing kthreadd since it, as the changelog says, has the ability to
spawn threads that become PF_THREAD_BOUND. By logic, we then can't allow
kthreadd to be attached to cgroups where PF_THREAD_BOUND matters either.
I know we've been through several iterations on this over the past several
months and the patch getting dropped a couple times along the way, but I
really do appreciate your time and effort spent in developing this fix,
it's very helpful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists