[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120406061248.GA16549@pcnci2.linuxbox.cz>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:13:05 +0200
From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Stuart Foster <smf.linux@...world.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz
Subject: Re: [ 101/175] mm: vmscan: forcibly scan highmem if there are too
many buffer_heads pinning highmem
Hi, sorry it took me a bit longer.
here's my backport, compiles fine, kernel boots without any problems.
please review.
n.
Signed-off-by: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz
(backport of upstream commit cc715d99e529d470dde2f33a6614f255adea71f3)
mm: vmscan: forcibly scan highmem if there are too many buffer_heads pinning highmem
Stuart Foster reported on bugzilla that copying large amounts of data
from NTFS caused an OOM kill on 32-bit X86 with 16G of memory. Andrew
Morton correctly identified that the problem was NTFS was using 512
blocks meaning each page had 8 buffer_heads in low memory pinning it.
In the past, direct reclaim used to scan highmem even if the allocating
process did not specify __GFP_HIGHMEM but not any more. kswapd no longer
will reclaim from zones that are above the high watermark. The intention
in both cases was to minimise unnecessary reclaim. The downside is on
machines with large amounts of highmem that lowmem can be fully consumed
by buffer_heads with nothing trying to free them.
The following patch is based on a suggestion by Andrew Morton to extend
the buffer_heads_over_limit case to force kswapd and direct reclaim to
scan the highmem zone regardless of the allocation request or watermarks.
Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42578
---
diff -Naur linux-3.0/mm/vmscan.c linux-3.0-cc715d99e529d470dde2f33a6614f255adea71f3-backport/mm/vmscan.c
--- linux-3.0/mm/vmscan.c 2012-04-05 23:09:28.364000004 +0200
+++ linux-3.0-cc715d99e529d470dde2f33a6614f255adea71f3-backport/mm/vmscan.c 2012-04-05 23:25:30.989968627 +0200
@@ -1581,6 +1581,14 @@
putback_lru_page(page);
continue;
}
+
+ if (unlikely(buffer_heads_over_limit)) {
+ if (page_has_private(page) && trylock_page(page)) {
+ if (page_has_private(page))
+ try_to_release_page(page, 0);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ }
+ }
if (page_referenced(page, 0, sc->mem_cgroup, &vm_flags)) {
nr_rotated += hpage_nr_pages(page);
@@ -2053,6 +2061,14 @@
struct zoneref *z;
struct zone *zone;
+ /*
+ * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
+ * allowed level, force direct reclaim to scan the highmem zone as
+ * highmem pages could be pinning lowmem pages storing buffer_heads
+ */
+ if (buffer_heads_over_limit)
+ sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
+
for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
if (!populated_zone(zone))
@@ -2514,7 +2530,8 @@
(zone->present_pages +
KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
- if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
+ if ((buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem_idx(i)) ||
+ !zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap,
end_zone, 0)) {
shrink_zone(priority, zone, &sc);
@@ -2543,6 +2560,17 @@
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine
+ * exceeds the maximum allowed level and this node
+ * has a highmem zone, force kswapd to reclaim from
+ * it to relieve lowmem pressure.
+ */
+ if (buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem_idx(i)) {
+ end_zone = i;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0)) {
all_zones_ok = 0;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists