[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1204070222130.18937@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 02:26:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: support structured and multi-facility log
messages
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Kay Sievers wrote:
> - Output of dev_printk() is reliably machine-readable now. In addition
> to the printed plain text message, it creates a log dictionary with the
> following properties:
> SUBSYSTEM= - the driver-core subsytem name
> DEVICE=
> b12:8 - block dev_t
> c127:3 - char dev_t
> n8 - netdev ifindex
> +sound:card0 - subsystem:devname
One of the questions that hasn't been raised yet, and which I personally
consider crucial -- are we making printk() interface part of userspace ABI
now by this?
Today, we are free to change any printk()s and not feel guilty about it at
all. With this, we are making the whole thing much more systematic and
friendly for automatic userspace consumption. Nnot really different to,
for example uevents, which I believe everyone considers userspace ABI now.
Do we really want that?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists