linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy_TOEE-8RNmNKVz6xZ7s+f02jCVcDbA=MJY1iih=AJpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:36:03 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...jolero.org>
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...jolero.org> wrote:
> -MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL-Compatible");

I really don't see the point.

This makes things *worse*.

"Dual BSD/GPL" actually tells you something: it tells you that you can
take that code, and use it in a BSD project.

In contrast "GPL-compatible" tells you nothing at all.

So you are actually removing real information, and just making things
harder for everybody.

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/