[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120407215641.GA4539@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:56:41 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, neilb@...e.de,
rpurdie@...ux.intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] LEDS-One-Shot-Timer-Trigger-implementation
Hi Shuah,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:13:44AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> > > +This feature will help implement vibrate functionality which requires one
> > > +time activation of vibrate mode without a continuous vibrate on/off cycles.
> >
> > They make vibrating LED? ;)
> >
> > What's going on here? You're proposing to repurpose the LEDs code to
> > drive vibration devices? Or some devices couple a LED with a vibration
> > device?
>
> I owe you filling in the blanks type explanation. Let me describe the
> use-case I am trying to address first. Vibrater function on phones is
> implemented using PWM pins on SoC or PMIC. When there is no such
> hardware present, a software solution is needed. Currently two drivers
> timed-gpio and timed-output (under staging/android in Linux 3.3)
> together implement the software vibrate feature. The main functionality
> it implements is the one time enables of timer to prevent user space
> crashes leaving the phone in vibrate mode causing the battery to drain.
> leds as it is implemented currently, is not suitable to address this
> use-case as it doesn't support one time enables.
So why do not you use memoryless force feedback framework that other
devices use (see drivers/input/misc/*vibra.c drivers).
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists