[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120407022512.2C65C3E1B12@localhost>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:25:12 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:49:17 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:48:32PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> > Can we make devm_gpio_request a static inline wrapper around
> > devm_gpio_request_one() with the flags field set to '0'? I don't liek
> > the duplication of this function.
>
> > Similarily, gpio_request() should actually be a static inline around
> > gpio_request_one() instead of the other way around as it is currently
> > written.
>
> Yeah, I couldn't understand why the non-managed functions were written
> in this way so I followed the same pattern when I added the managed one
> assuming that the original code was sane.
Actually, I looked at it again, and the _one version behaves subtly
different from the non-_one version. That may be irrelevant though.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists