[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333784800.3170.4.camel@Abyss>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:46:40 +0200
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
cfriesen@...tel.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fcheccon@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE push and pull logic
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 10:32 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> kernel/sched_dl.c | 912
> >>> kernel/sched_rt.c | 2 +-
>
> You are working on 2.6.3x, x <= 8 ?
>
Not really. Why saying so? :-O
> If so, what is the reason(just curious)?
> Already planned to add in 3.3 and above?
>
The n.0 mail of this series "[RFC][PATCH 00/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE
v4" says:
<< - this time we sit on top of PREEMPT_RT (3.2.13-rt23); we continue
to aim at mainline inclusion, but we also see -rt folks as
immediate and interested users.
...
As said, patchset is on top of PREEMPT_RT (as of today). However,
Insop Song (from Ericsson) is maintaining a parallel branch for the
current tip/master (https://github.com/insop/sched-deadline2).>>
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists