[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120409221630.8c94f31ef68d4a89941a3413@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:16:30 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] KVM: MMU: get expected spte out of mmu-lock
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:28:47 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ah, so it's protecting two paths at the same time: rmap.write_protect ->
> fast page fault, and lock(sptep) -> write protect.
>
> The whole thing needs to be documented very carefully in locking.txt,
> otherwise mmu.c will be write-protected to everyone except you.
Before changing mmu_lock usage, better describe it in locking.txt.
I guess from mmu.c git history, it is already restricted to a few
people who can describe that.
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists