linux-kernel - re: Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003501cd15f7$13547560$39fd6020$@com.cn>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:18:23 +0800
From:	"Liu Yu" <liuyums@...tor.com.cn>
To:	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: re: Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET?

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org]
> 发送时间: 2012年4月7日 3:05
> 收件人: Liu Yu
> 抄送: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 主题: Re: Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET?
> 
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:12:24 +0800
> "Liu Yu" <liuyums@...tor.com.cn> wrote:
> 
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I saw a couple of places in current kernel have this kind of code:
> >
> > > static inline unsigned int elapsed_jiffies_msecs(unsigned long start)
> > > {
> > >         unsigned long end = jiffies;
> > >
> > >         if (end >= start)
> > >                return jiffies_to_msecs(end - start);
> > >
> > >         return jiffies_to_msecs(end + (MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET - start) + 1);
> > > }
> >
> > As you know, jiffies has a type of unsigned long, so if we know which is
the
> > end and
> > which is the start, then (end - start) can simply figure out how much
> > jiffies flies,
> > without worry about the overflow.
> >
> > Look at the code above, assume that there is just an overflow happening
on
> > jiffies: end=0 and start=~0UL.
> > Since end < start, then the return value of the function is
> > jiffies_to_msecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET+2).
> > But shouldn't the correct value be jiffies_to_msecs(1)?
> >
> > could someone tell me that am I missing anything?
> >
> 
> Seems right.  The code should be
> 
> static inline unsigned long elapsed_jiffies_msecs(unsigned long start)
> {
> 	return jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start);
> }
> 
> Note the return type.  jiffies_to_msecs() currently returns unsigned
> int.  I think it should return unsigned long.  Even then, it can still
> overflow with valid inputs on HZ=100 32-bit machines.

Thanks a lot for your reply :)

I saw similar code in
	drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/libipw_wx.c
	net/wireless/scan.c
	include/linux/jbd2.h

hope someone can fix this. :)

Thanks,
Yu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/