linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] LEDS-One-Shot-Timer-Trigger-implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:55:49 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	shuahkhan@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	neilb@...e.de, rpurdie@...ux.intel.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] LEDS-One-Shot-Timer-Trigger-implementation

On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 14:56 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:13:44AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > 
> > > > +This feature will help implement vibrate functionality which requires one
> > > > +time activation of vibrate mode without a continuous vibrate on/off cycles.
> > > 
> > > They make vibrating LED? ;)
> > > 
> > > What's going on here?  You're proposing to repurpose the LEDs code to
> > > drive vibration devices?  Or some devices couple a LED with a vibration
> > > device?
> > 
> > I owe you filling in the blanks type explanation. Let me describe the
> > use-case I am trying to address first. Vibrater function on phones is
> > implemented using PWM pins on SoC or PMIC. When there is no such
> > hardware present, a software solution is needed. Currently two drivers
> > timed-gpio and timed-output (under staging/android in Linux 3.3)
> > together implement the software vibrate feature. The main functionality
> > it implements is the one time enables of timer to prevent user space
> > crashes leaving the phone in vibrate mode causing the battery to drain.
> > leds as it is implemented currently, is not suitable to address this
> > use-case as it doesn't support one time enables.
> 
> So why do not you use memoryless force feedback framework that other
> devices use (see drivers/input/misc/*vibra.c drivers).
> 

Dimitry,

I took a look at these vibra* drivers. The three vibrate drivers are
chip-set specific. The use-case I have is a non-chip set approach to
address the use-case when vibrate hardware is not present. Are you
envisioning a generic approach using ff-memoryless infrastructure?

-- Shuah

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/