[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxo3aQT32RZT64wjARYiGLTkvAvKUuoQZw81mTDXdS8nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:10:47 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] perf: Build libtraceevent.a
2012/4/6 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:
> Right, what I meant was to add the $(LIBTRACEEVENT): target above to the
> toplevel Makefile so that when you're in the kernel source tree, you do
>
> $ make tools/perf
>
> it has a target $(LIBTRACEEVENT) dependent on it in the toplevel
> Makefile instead of perf's Makefile to avoid duplication. Then, when
> perf is rebuilt, it simply links with this lib. IOW, not have the "make
> -C" call in perf's Makefile but in the toplevel Makefile because other
> tools will want to use libtraceevent.a too and link against it.
>
> Oh well, the toplevel Makefile patches aren't upstream either so we're
> wasting cycles here, I'll fix that up when the times comes.
Yeah let's sort those details out once we have that library merged ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists