[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20355.13473.382563.281929@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:42:33 +0530
From: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>
To: Michael Leun <lkml20120218@...ton.leun.net>
CC: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Kelly Anderson <kelly@...ka.with-linux.com>,
linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<casteyde.christian@...e.fr>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net>
Subject: [ath9k-devel] 3.4-rc ath9k regression (Re: 3.3.1 ath9k regression)
Michael Leun wrote:
> After an suspend to disk / resume cycle (in kernel suspend to disk,
> openSuSE) with 3.4-rc2 my ath9k wireless does not ping
> anymore.
>
> Output of iwconfig wlan0 looks just as usual (associated to AP).
>
> iwconfig wlan0 essid <myssid> fixes this (causes an
> deauthenticate/authenticate with AP) - then connectivity is there again.
>
> Guess what: "Of course" does not happen when reverting
> c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214 ath9k: fix going to full-sleep
> on PS idle.
>
> So, in my opinion it should be seriously considered to revert that patch
> until it is fully understood what is going on and why.
>
> It may look theoretically correct (I've no knowledge that would enable
> me assess that), but it seems to have caused 3 more or less different
> problems to various people.
The patch in question should just be reverted for 3.3.1-stable. It would mean
that power-saving would take a hit on that kernel - but it's impact would be
much lesser than a broken driver, one that fails in basic connection.
I'll send a patch reverting c1afdaff90538ef085b756454f12b29575411214.
For 3.4, can you build the driver with debugging enabled [1] , load the driver
with debug=0x801 and post the log here (before/after resume) ?
Thanks.
[1] : http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/debug
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists