[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA42YNwM2_pUS=EYrk88ih1wbHXtL56C73hdxVz6J4bgTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:25:48 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: libseccomp-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: ANN: libseccomp
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> With the seccomp patches finally stabilizing a bit, it seems like now is a
> good time to announce libseccomp: a library designed to make it easier to
> create complex, architecture independent seccomp filters.
>
> * http://sourceforge.net/projects/libseccomp/
> * git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/libseccomp/libseccomp
>
> The library has only been in development for the past couple months, so it may
> be a little rough around the edges, and definitely could use more testing, but
> it is functional and has had some basic testing against the seccomp v17
> patches. The project currently lacks any online documentation or a website
> beyond the basic SF.net tools, but there are current man pages in the source
> repository and the code is reasonably well commented.
Do you think the GPLv2 license will limit adoption of it's usage across
a wider variety of software projects? I'm not anti-GPL by any means
but I am slightly surprised libseccomp is using it.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists