[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXp_73pj5N-SaZdOG9NLK0miEPhjrYqyAhPaUBpgNOPOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:48:23 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Keping Chen <chenkeping@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI, ACPI, x86: update MMCFG information when
hot-plugging PCI host bridges
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
>>> +int arch_acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>>> +{
>>> + acpi_status status;
>>> + unsigned long long base_addr;
>>> +
>>> + /* Remove MMCFG information for host bridges with _CBA method */
>>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(root->device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CBA,
>>> + NULL, &base_addr);
>>
>> add one flag in acpi_pci_root about we added mmconf for it before?
>> like mmconf_added?
>>
>
> I feel adding a flag here doesn't help here. For any hot-pluggable PCI host bridge
> with _CBA method available, arch_acpi_pci_root_remove() should delete the MMCFG
> information, no matter it's added by __pci_mmcfg_init() or arch_acpi_pci_root_add().
> So check existence of _CBA seems simpler here.
please check updated patch that will use mmconf_added.
it will make sure only remove mmconf with _CBA.
other than that if BIOS have duplicated one in MCFG table, and
_CBA, will bail out early.
Line added will be 68 instead of 90.
also some changes could be merged to patch 1-5.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "jiang_mmconf_6_v3.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (9448 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists